Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Our Interactions in AGT
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Lecture 2 - Thursday Week 1
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Lecture 2 - 15 Jan 2026 == Review from diff geo: * Tangent space <math display="inline">T_{m}M</math> * Tangent bundle <math display="inline">TM</math> with map <math display="inline">\pi:TM \rightarrow M</math> * Vector field on <math display="inline">M</math> is: ** derivation of <math display="inline">C^{\infty}(M)</math> ** map <math display="inline">X:M \rightarrow TM</math> such that <math display="inline">\pi \circ X = \text{id}_{M}</math>. We can do same construction after cooking up new vector spaces from the tangent space <math display="inline">T_{m}M</math>. e.g. <math display="inline">T_{m}M \rightarrow {T^{*}}_{m}M = \left( T_{m}M \right)^{*}</math> is the dual space of <math display="inline">T_{m}M</math>, called '''cotangent space'''. Then we have <math display="inline">T^{*}M = \cup_{m}T_{m}^{*}M</math>, also a manifold, the '''cotangent bundle'''. A map <math display="inline">\alpha:M \rightarrow {T_{m}^{*}M}</math> such that <math display="inline">\pi^{*} \circ \alpha = \text{id}_{M}</math> (i.e. a section of <math display="inline">\pi^{*}</math>) is a '''one-form'''. note <math display="inline">\Lambda</math> is '''exterior power'''. <math display="inline">\Lambda^{k}{T_{m}^{*}M} \rightarrow {T^{*}M}</math> β¦ More generally for <math display="inline">{T_{m}M}\text{tensor}\ldots\text{tensor}{T_{m}M}\text{tensor}{T_{m}^{*}M}\text{tensor}\ldots\text{tensor}{T_{m}^{*}M}</math> we get bundle <math display="inline">{TM}\text{tensor}\ldots\text{tensor}{TM}\text{tensor}{T^{*}M}\text{tensor}\ldots\text{tensor}{T^{*}M}</math> in particular * <math display="inline">\Lambda:\Omega^{k}(M) \times \Omega^{l}(M) \rightarrow \Omega^{k + l}(M)</math> where <math display="inline">(\alpha,\beta)| \rightarrow \alpha\Lambda\beta</math> * <math display="inline">X</math> vector field, <math display="inline">\alpha \in \Omega^{k}(M)</math>, then <math display="inline">\iota_{X}:{\Omega^{k}(M)} \rightarrow \Omega^{k - 1}(M)</math>, where <math display="inline">\alpha| \rightarrow \iota_{X}\alpha</math>, which has equation <math display="block">\left( \iota_{X}\alpha \right)\left( X_{2},\ldots,X_{k} \right) = \alpha(X,X_{2},\ldots,K_{k}).</math> So we plug in <math display="inline">X</math> to first arg of <math display="inline">\alpha</math>. === Lie bracket === For <math display="inline">X,Y</math> in <math display="inline">\Gamma({TM})</math> where <math display="inline">\Gamma</math> is the space of sections of β¦ <math display="inline">\rightarrow \lbrack X,Y\rbrack \in \Gamma(TM)</math> defined by: for all <math display="block">f \in C^{\infty(M)}</math>, <math display="block">\lbrack X,Y\rbrack(f) = X\left( Y(f) \right) - Y\left( X(f) \right).</math> Note that the above is a derivation, whereas <math display="inline">X\left( Y(f) \right)</math> on itβs own is not. Lie bracket has properties of * symmetry * bilinearity * jacobi identity === Flow Map === Given <math display="inline">X \in \Gamma({TM}),m \in M</math>, we get curve <math display="inline">c:(a,b) \rightarrow M</math> such that <math display="inline">c(0) = m</math> and <math display="inline">c\prime(t) = X_{c}(t)</math>. that is to say flow curves exist at each point. If <math display="inline">M</math> is compact then all such curves are defined on <math display="inline">(a,b) = ( - \infty,\infty) = {\mathbb{R}}</math>. These curves combine to give a group action of <math display="inline">({\mathbb{R}}, + )</math>, <math display="inline">\Phi^{\times}:{\mathbb{R}} \times M \rightarrow M</math> with formula <math display="inline">\Phi^{\times (t,\Phi^{\times ()})} = \ldots</math> i.e. we have a group morphism <math display="inline">({\mathbb{R}}, + ) \rightarrow \text{ Diffeo}(M)</math>. care is needed if <math display="inline">M</math> not compact, flow map may not be defined for all of <math display="inline">\mathbb{R}</math>. but given <math display="inline">X \in \Gamma({TM})</math> we still have local flow map defined on open containing <math display="inline">\left\{ 0 \right\} \times M</math>, i.e. <math display="inline">\Phi^{\times}:D \subset {\mathbb{R}} \times M \rightarrow M</math>. === Lie Bracket in terms of flows === <math display="inline">\lbrack X,Y\rbrack = \frac{d^{2}}{{dt}^{2}}\left| \_(t = 0)\left( {\Phi^{Y}}_{- t} \circ {\Phi^{X}}_{- t} \circ {\Phi^{Y}}_{t} \circ {\Phi^{X}}_{t} \right) = \frac{d}{dt} \right|_{t = 0}(\left( {\Phi^{Y}}_{\sqrt{- t}} \circ {\Phi^{X}}_{\sqrt{- t}} \circ {\Phi^{Y}}_{\sqrt{t}} \circ {\Phi^{X}}_{\sqrt{t}} \right)</math>. The lie bracket measures how far the vector fields <math display="inline">X,Y</math> are from commuting with each other. === Lie Derivative === Let <math display="inline">X \in \Gamma({TM})</math> we can take the '''Lie derivative''' of * vector fields * differential forms * tensor fieds and <math display="block">{LX}(Y) = \lbrack X,Y\rbrack</math> for vector fields. For differential forms, we have cartans formula to tell us <math display="inline">{LX}(\alpha) = \left( d \circ \iota_{X} + \iota \circ d \right)(\alpha)</math>. The lie derivative satisfies product rule <math display="inline">{LX}(A \otimes B) = {LX}(A) \otimes B + A \rightarrow {LX}(B)</math>. apart from functions: <math display="inline">{LX}(f) = X(f) = df(X) = \iota_{X}(df)</math>, evaluating <math display="inline">{{LX}(A)}_{m}</math> depends on more than just <math display="inline">X_{m}</math>. i.e. the lie dervative is <math display="inline">\mathbb{R}</math>-linear but not <math display="inline">C^{\infty}(M)</math>-linear. So <math display="block">L_{aX + bY} = aL_{X} + bL_{Y}\text{ }\forall a,b \in {\mathbb{R}}</math> but <math display="block">L_{fX} \neq fL_{X}</math> we will be using a riemannian metric to give a connection that satisfies the above, which the lie derivative doesnt.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Our Interactions in AGT may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Our Interactions in AGT:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Lecture 2 - Thursday Week 1
Add topic